This only pertains to the brewers trading him to another team, not the brewers trading someone to the pirates so we can keep wang without the rule 5 stipulations and send him down to onthe minors. With the waivers issue, there sems to be some confusion. There were 2 articles posted that seem to contradict each other. http://www.thecubreporter.com/book/export/html/3517 This one says a player must pass through waivers. http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/minorleagues/rule_5.jsp?mc=faq This one, which is actually an faq, is a little more vague. Does this mean he then has to go through waivers or are they saying he can be placed in the minors now? Way to not be clear. Then there is the story about dickys rule 5 experience http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20080329&content_id=2464940&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb&fext=.jsp which states specifically that he went through waivers before the trade happened which allowed the Ms to keep him. It doesn't really say if he had to go through waivers or if he was going through and the idea of a trade was broached and then not finalized till he was through by coincidence. So basicly, there isn't really a clear answer, but the evidence seems to suggest waivers needs to happen before the brewers could send him to the minors, either through trade with the pirates or pirates not wanting him back. Each of these links have appeared in the thread previously, kudos to those who did the leg work to find them.