I don't really get that kind of logic. It's convenient to look at home/road splits but we can look at any other mostly-random splits that we want to. Day/night, roof open/closed, day games after night games, record on Thursdays, etc... It all makes interesting trivia but I don't see the utility in it. I do not believe that there is anything about the Brewers as a team that has caused them to significantly over perform at home and under perform on the road. What could even affect the whole team? Just a curious happenstance, in my opinion. And it is just as easy to suggest the Brewers shouldn't be as dominating at home as they have been so far. If the Brewers were .500 on the road they would be 50-32 and on pace for 99 wins. The Brewers are a decent team but they are nothing special. They are no where near a 99 win team. They are now on pace for 85 wins which is right around where they were expected to be. Hell, the brutal part of the schedule is over, so I'd probably expect more wins than that (based on just their performance this year). It was a terrible series but let's lets look at the big picture. The Brewers are done being bent over by the AL East and will have at at least a share of the NL Central after today. Did anyone really have higher expectations than that? I agree with you on the idea of splits being kind of trivial when compared to the big pictures, but your happenstance comment is far from the truth. After watching a good amount of the games this season the team takes on a completely different form when they are on the road. You can almost feel it while watching a game. They exude confidence at home and show non on the road. This team doesn’t have the same mental makeup on the road as they do at home. Does it make sense? Not really, but that is 100% the case. The pitchers don’t have confidence in their stuff the hitters lose their approach.