Well, in real life actual data terms rather than speculative panic terms, a country of well over a billion people had 80,000+ get infected within the last 3 months and over 3200 of those people died. One month ago, the stats for that country were ~75,000 infections and 2200+ deaths. The outbreak there was far worse than anywhere else in the world to this point and yet it the infection has slowed to a near standstill (only foreign cases--they say, anyway). Drastic measures were taken, and only a couple of months later it appears those measures worked (again, if you believe the numbers). These numbers are so much lower than even the best case projections it is a little bizarre to me. 80,000 cases in China, only 5,000 in the last MONTH. That 80000 is .0057% of the population that is infected. Meanwhile, the NYT is publishing articles about hospital bed shortages IF 20%, 40% or 60% of the US populations gets infected. Umm, what?? Granted, we're not China (Thank God) so we may not get the same kind of total control....but 20% as best case scenario vs .0057% is a gargantuan gap. Obviously, the situation in Italy is much worse, and the rest of Europe doesn't look much better. Right now. In other places like South Korea things quieted down pretty quick. In other words, there is an extremely wide variance between best case and worst case scenarios right now and nobody is actually publishing the best case scenarios...because the more people that believe the best case scenarios to be true the worse things will end up in actuality. There is a lot of panic and fear mongering going on right now--and it's honestly for the best. The more people that freak out (without like...ACTUALLY freaking out...mental health is important too and it's affects are more subtle than CV) in the short term the shorter overall term we'll all have to deal with this. Still, the casualty in that scenario is the actual truth, which does still matter to some people.