Is it so terrible to pay a reliable middle of the order 3B/1B $12M per year with a 3 year commitment? Also all that matters is that he's making $12M per, not $16M in 2014. It's actually $6M, $10M, $16M, $4M and it's cheaper for us to pay him that big number in 2014 and defer $4M all the way until 2015. Although, I don't like his 'first pitch' mentality, but if he produces with it I won't complain. Not necessarily. My guess is that they structured the contract the way they did because they couldn't afford any more payroll this year. By backloading it the way they did, they basically made him untradeable, as few if any teams are going to be willing to pay the 2014 version of Ramirez $16MM + a $4MM buyout unless the Brewers pick up a good share of the contract. In my opinion, they would have been better off paying him $12MM / year, but again, they probably couldn't afford the extra money this year. The Ramirez signing was definitely a "go for it" move for 2012, and I just hope he holds up (both physically and production-wise) for the next few years. I also hope his signing doesn't keep us from extending Greinke, who is far more important for the continued success of the Brewers beyond 2012. Disagree. It's the same money going in or coming out and it doesn't matter what you label it in the ledger. If they trade him with 1 year left and $20M effectively left on his contract they could send the other team money so they can pay it to Ramirez...or the Brewers can pay Ramirez that same money now and not have to send it away in a trade. Deferring money is always good for the team. If they want to, they can essentially choose to make him into a $12M per year player at any time by just putting the difference in the bank and labeling it the 'Aramis fund'. Even if they want to trade him, they can shop Aramis and the 'Aramis fund' package and there you go, his value is $12M per year.