Didn't something happen in the Mexican League last year (or two years ago) where the batter swung and missed and the umpire called a ball? https://www.si.com/mlb/2018/07/20/mexican-league-umpires-suspended-missed-strike-call-video The bunt missed call is not that far from this clip, honestly. As to the interference, rules are often written to be vague enough to allow for a wide berth of interpretations. Mostly, this is done to to keep power in the hands of certain people (look at how my health insurance company interprets coverage documents, or the people in charge of my car warranty can plausibly deny claims they should, via the spirit of the agreement, cover). This just feels like an umpire using the flexibility the rulebook allows for in an utterly irresponsible way--to avoid taking ownership of a call that violates the entire concept of interference. How he could watch that play and continue to defend that call is just self-delusion. It's way worse than the initial mistake to me. If he really thinks interference is justified in that scenario, then he and I are have totally different conceptions of baseball.