People would have said the same thing about Michael Brantley or Lorenzo Cain had anyone rated them that highly following their age 22 seasons. It may not be likely that Reed ever performs up to that rating, but there is also a non-zero chance that he does. Reed (Age 22) AA: 278/379/422 122 wRC+ AAA: 246/351/381 100 wRC+ Brantley (Age 22) AAA: 267/350/361 100 wRC+ Cain (Age 22) A+: 287/358/448 128 wRC+ AA: 277/363/486 125 w RC+ Yah it would have been ridiculous. Should we go back to all the players that had poor years in A+ and use that to explain why everyone in our system is great? You can't just pull up minor league stats and start comparing players. Michael Reed is not even close to being a 60+. Would you seriously put Reed anywhere near Clark/Phillips? Sure he could magically obtain some power, but I could say that about 2/3 of prospects. Every player has that "If he just adds some power" label. Michael Reed has not done anything that would make one seem he can be more than an average OFer at best. 60+ is All Star level according to this writer. It is too early to be ranking Reed that high...maybe a year from now he could be there, but right now it is a serious stretch. Should be interesting to look back on his rankings a year from now. Very bold.