I'm not confused about your point and I'm not sure the above statement is really making a distinction. I mean, believe what you want to believe but you are making a judgement on an individual based on how you think he should behave given a certain set of conditions and you are doing so with very limited information. You have literally zero idea as to the accountability standards Arcia is held to behind closed doors and/or whether Arcia is meeting those standards. Maybe they have set the expectation with Arcia that they just need him to play good defense and offense isn't the important thing. If so, why wouldn't he be happy he is meeting the expectations of his employer. Your expectations don't really mean anything. Right, he sucks. Nobody has argued that point. It sounds like you might have an issue with the Brewers playing him so much but that isn't his fault. As if baseball is equivalent to the world us poor schleps live in. Players other than Arcia will and do get paid millions to literally suck at their jobs. Generally, I find that people who have an issue with other people being who they are have their own set of issues. It just seems a little intolerant to me.