Jump to content
Brewer Fanatic

Underachiever

Verified Member
  • Posts

    3,659
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

News

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospects Ranking

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

Milwaukee Brewers Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Pick Tracker

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Underachiever

  1. More like Texas A&M, Nebraska, and other places paying off football coaches.
  2. Really appreciate the info and discussion.
  3. Talk to me about Ashby. He’s my pitching version of Garrett Mitchell in that many posters are higher on him than I am. And this was before Ashby’s injury. Who’s a comp for him, if healthy? Is he a 2? A3?
  4. We have a thread on offense, so I want to hear the BF Brain's thoughts about the rotation. I remember last year there was discussion about having 8 starters to choose from, and then injuries took care of that. Since Burnes is still on the team, he anchors the rotation with Peralta, Miley, Rea, and then...Joe Ross? Ethan Small? Jacob Misiorowski? Robert Gasser? Last year, in my memory, at this time we had Burnes, Woodruff, Peralta, Miley, Houser, Lauer, Ashby, with maybe some talk of Bryse Wilson. Ended up needing 33 starts from Rea and Teheran. I was looking for some information on Aaron Ashby and cannot find anything substantive. There is this quote from Matt Arnold: “He really feels good. He’s coming back, throwing, playing catch, working out,” Arnold said. “I think he’s on track to be a part of our rotation, hopefully next year. That’s the expectation. This guy is working his tail off to try to come back and he’s definitely on the right track." Does that mean he expects Ashby to be game-ready from the start of next year, or just sometime next year? “It’s hard to say,” Arnold said. “You want to be cautious with these types of things. When he’s ready, he’s certainly going to be part of our mix, for sure.” To me, that doesn't sound good. Is anyone here thinking he will pitch this year? Is it another Woodruff situation? I look forward to the discussion.
  5. From Wikipedia: A common generic name for medieval war horses was charger, which was interchangeable with the other terms). In Spain, the jennet was used as a light cavalry horse. Stallions were often used as war horses in Europe due to their natural aggression and hot-blooded tendencies. Connect the dots, people!
  6. Craig Counsell's ears just perked up.
  7. You mentioned it, but what if Hoskins wouldn't have taken a two-year deal? Don't you think he is banking on having a good year and then getting his payday? If he thinks he is a good "prove it" year from a 4/80 contract, then he is going to want the one year opt out. The Brewers' decision at that point is to take the one year or leave it. He might have no interest in a rebuild. Maybe he wants to mash with the Brewers this year, but have the option to not hang around if they let Burnes, Adames, and Williams go. None of us know. If you believe in the front office, then they will figure it out. So many moving parts. Would the Brewers have done this if Woodruff was healthy, and they had his salary on the books? For the 2024 season, the Brewers are a better team today than they were two days ago, and that's good.
  8. Here is why this upsets me. This signing needed to happen one day earlier. Yesterday, Immaculate Grid had a square for "Boston-Played one game at 3rd base". I could probably have gotten a better rarity score using this name.
  9. And if Hoskins has a poor first year, that doesn’t mean the second year will be poor. Hope!
  10. This is cool. I was firmly in the “not gonna happen” camp. I thought someone would give him more years or money. Glad to be wrong.
  11. Please, no. I believe I am as optimistic as anyone who posts here. Signing Votto would put a "home-run-ball-into-the-Toyota-Tundra" sized-dent in my optimism.
  12. Good prediction. However, I preferred the approach the Packers took. Don't reduce the possessions, just score on 6 of the first 7.
  13. Thanks for the responses, I got a good laugh. Fortunately the wedding is in the Caribbean and everything will be over by the time the game starts, local time, so my initial post was fully tongue-in-cheek. At my mom's funeral, a guy wore a Packer jacket and Packer Zubaz. The funeral was at 9 in the morning. On a Wednesday. In March.
  14. Sorry to derail the Packer thread with a personal problem, but I have to have "the talk" with my son this week. He's getting married on Saturday and I don't know how to tell him I won't be there.
  15. Can anyone smarter than me talk about the Hicks contract? Starter? $44 million? For a guy who has started 8 games in his career? I don't get it. I guess because all I saw at STL was a max velocity guy, I never thought of him as a starter.
  16. Houston lost to Iowa State on Tuesday. No more undefeateds. 1, 2, 3, 5, 9, and 11 lost this week when you add in Tennesee, Oklahoma and Marquette.
  17. Yesterday was bad. Today is fine. I'm in Madison.
  18. I'm going to the Caribbean for a week. If a trade happens while I am gone, could you post something hysterical on my behalf? Start with how much I hate the trade. Make sure the phrases "dumpster-diving", "tanking", and "trash" are included, and go ahead and pick a new team for me to root for. Don't forget to include my signature.
  19. Packers are playing the game, they might as well win it. Sad Jerry is the best Jerry. Dak Prescott is 2-4 in the playoffs and has only beaten Tampa, who had a 45 yo QB, and a Seattle team that had a QB benched in favor of Jarrett Stidham this year. So, nobody. I am glad they are not playing at Detroit, because they will probably have the Wolverines at the game, and talk about how they overcame getting caught cheating adversity, and I don't need to see that.
  20. It certainly makes sense, coming off of an injury, that he would like to do that. Have the player options, or the mutual options, become more common the last few years, or did I just miss hearing about it in the past? That seems like what a player would want on a "prove it" deal.
  21. Lovie said the "number one goal" was to beat Green Bay, not the only goal. Big difference. And again, since the Packers were at the top of the division, it made sense.
  22. I don't think so. One thing that I have learned is that fans often have way more emotion into these matters than the front office types. The Brewers will try to win the division, regardless of whether it is with or without Burnes.
  23. Ask yourself if you apply the same scrutiny to other coaches and analysts that the Brewers hire for their system. Or is it just the females.
  24. For those who want Hoskins, is there a number at which you say, "OK, I'm out?" The 2/36 number, I believe, is going to be low, because I think someone would have signed him at that already. As mentioned, I believe that he is looking for more years. If someone signs him for 4/80, would you say Mark A is cheap? Given that we have no idea what the Brewers nor Hoskins are thinking, what's your number? I believe that someone is going to blink and give Hoskins way more than 2/36, whether in years, dollars, or both.
×
×
  • Create New...