This is a logical argument that I can get behind. In fact, I think something like this should probably be expected. We aren't going to see a full-on "throw caution to the wind" type offseason, but I fully expect 2-3 moves that could be construed as "big" that will likely raise the payroll. I don't even know what "This is so easy it's not even funny" even means, though. Baseball economics are far from easy. Yeah, I definitely agree with the "so easy it's not even funny" being totally untrue. We don't know where Castellanos wants to play, we don't know how many years he might get, we have no way of knowing if 3/66 gets it done. That said, if it was enough, I'd have no problem making that deal (obviously isn't my coin). But if we can afford a nearly 20M QO on Avi which we're considering, we can afford 22M for 3 years on Nick. There is a significant difference between a one-year, $18.4 million guaranteed deal, and $66 million guaranteed over 3 years. And I'd bet dollars to doughnuts that Castellanos is looking for 4+ years.