I think this is the core of all the issues you've had, though. You keep insisting, rather bluntly many times, that David Stearns be something that he has proven time and time again not to be. You want him to be impulsive, aggressive and, frankly, careless when it comes to player acquisition. I just think the guy has a long enough track record to prove now that that's just not the way he's going to operate. Every move the guy makes is researched and measured, then measured again. He operates 100% based on value, which means he is hardly ever going to make the big signings and trade for the "bigger" names that you crave. In a lot of ways, I agree with you. I'd love to see the team acquire a proven TOR starter, and a proven high average power bat to play 3B. But those guys are the "name" guys, and they cost a lot in both money and prospect capital, which are things the Brewers just don't have a lot of right now. So what we are left with is a GM that has chosen to build the team by focusing on underappreciated and undervalued players, taking risks in the process. It really is what it is. That's the way they are going to do it for the immediate future. If you don't get on board with that philosophy, you're going to be a very unhappy, frustrated fan. I don't want to steer this off topic, but this brings up, to me, a perfect comparison. Ted Thompson(Who I despised), always blatantly ignored free agency, at least as far as big names go. He built his roster(s), essentially the same way Stearns does, with cheap, young players. Eventually what happened(as I knew it would), is the roster became terrible when injuries hit(they had no veteran depth at minimum) to get them through. They got so bad, they had losing records, and he eventually lost his job. Ironically the few times he did sign "name" guys in Free agency(think, Charles Woodson, Ryan Pickett etc) it worked out great. Fast forward to last year...what did they do?? Went out and revamped the defense by signing big $$ players in Preston Smith, Zhadarius Smith, and Adrian Amos. Andddddd just like that, their defense became a TON better. "Big name" free agency works EXACTLY the way it's supposed to, if you sign the right guys. Very similar in how Stearns mines for bargains, the same theory applies to big name FA's as well. Yes, i get it, the sports are different etc, but the concepts are the same. The NFL's salary cap puts teams on a much more even playing field when it comes to signing free agents. The NFL also shares revenue in a much greater capacity than MLB, which means most teams are created equal when it comes to having money available for player acquisition. I believe that MLB will eventually have to go this route, as the divide between the "haves" and "have nots" is currently as great as it's ever been. Comparing team building in the NFL to MLB is comparing apples and oranges Bringing it back to Hader, that's why the Brewers are even considering trading him. He's the best reliever in baseball, but because of the arbitration system, a limited revenue team like the Brewers simply cannot devote that large of a portion of its payroll to him. The Yankees don't care, because money is no object. The best the Brewers can hope for is that a team like the Yankees is willing to make an even, balanced deal. Or they can hang on to Hader, hope he is lights-out this season, and either deal him at the deadline (if they are not in contention) or look at dealing him next offseason. It sucks, but that's the current state of baseball.