Honestly, I don't care what his ERA is through x number of starts to begin the season if there's nothing alarming about how he's pitching, and there's not. It's just how it's worked out so far. Odds are, he'll be better from here on out. The point you really either seem to be missing or glossing over is that it is very difficult, at best, to "expect" anything out of any pitcher for 50 random innings to begin a season. This is part of the reason that relief pitchers are so hard to pin down. Sure, better pitchers will tend to pitch better in general, but plenty of awesome pitchers have produced poor results (at least via ERA) at the beginning of the year, or in any 50 random innings. If Greinke had allowed only 25 ER on the year as opposed to 31, he'd have a 4.22 ERA right now and I'm guessing this thread wouldn't exist. And it wouldn't exist because of 6 meager runs in 9 starts. A few runs here, and a few runs there. How's that for expectations? I don't think Greinke's start is worth gnashing teeth over, but clearly you disagree. Whatever - be disappointed all you want. But not everybody has to be, despite your beliefs. "High ERA, high K pitcher," hilarious indeed. Until proven otherwise...