Some very good stuff there.
First of all, a lot of people get all caught up in the glitz of the last day before the deadline, with the cameras rolling & all the commentary. They made moves beforehand. Taking a flyer on Keuchel made sense & cost them nothing, so it not working out was a wash. We'll see how Civale does moving forward, but that made perfect sense because they dealt from the middle INF pool in the lower minors, which is extremely deep. They did their homework on Mears & IMO that was a good to potentially very good move. What I didn't like about the Montas trade was giving up Junis. Methinks the Reds felt pretty good about acquiring Weimer & we could've added someone different. And Wiemers' recent performance suggests he's a long way from being totally given up on. That said, with the ability of Hook & Henderson to squeeze more performance out of some pitchers than you'd think they could, I don't get some of the negativity re Montas. Let's let that play out.
As to WHY they weren't more aggressive, I think you nailed it. On paper, '25 & '26 look very promising. I think the FO views '24 as an overachieving year where you certainly can get in, making a run is definitely possible, but not probable. Other than MAYBE looking a little harder at IKF I think they responded pretty well.