Ok, I know, these types of discussions can get fairly argumentative, but I'm going to bring it up anyways. Last year the HR rate per game in MLB was 1.16 (second highest ever). This year it's at 1.26 which would blow the old steroid era rate of 1.17 out of the water. http://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/MLB/bat.shtml Do we assume that PEDs are being used in full force again and that the vast majority of players know how to mask it? Seems logical. However, I also know that at least one poster on brewerfan has tried to make the argument that PEDs do nothing to increase homerun quantities in MLB and it's all tied to periods of expansion in baseball. Well, there has not been any expansion since 1998 and yet the HR rate has gone up significantly over the last 4 years (0.86 in 2014, 1.26 this year). The recent HR derby reminded me of the HR derby freak shows from the late 80's and early 90's. Players are on 60 HR paces again. So, if it's not PEDs or expansion, what is it, juiced ball? I know, this thread will bring out the "who cares" and "just let them use PEDs" argument. I don't agree with that sentiment, but that's ok. Let's just not pretend that PEDs do nothing to increase HR rates in baseball.