HiAndTight, I didn't mean to twist your words. Sorry if you took it that way. I'm fine with it if you think Gomez & Gamel have the potential to be 3-4 WAR players. My point is that if they are, we'd have a very solid all around lineup (with a possibly weak SS). The rotation would be a question mark but we still have Gallardo, Fiers, and Estrada, who have proven to be at least a solid 2-4 portion of the rotation and Thornburg who will likely be ready as well. So we'd basically need a top of the rotation guy, a SS, and a bullpen. The bullpen can usually be addressed cheaply which leaves two spots where we'd need to spend to have, what would be, a pretty solid team. And for what it's worth, I don't think if you remove a 3 WAR player from a lineup and replaced him with a 0 WAR player that you'd lose exactly three wins. There is a high degree of variability due to situational performance. It could probably be anywhere from 0 to 10 (I have no idea). However, the intention of the statistic is to show how many wins they would be worth if all other things were the same. My opinion is that you should use WAR to calculate how many wins you think your team is worth, understanding that there is a lot of variability in the actual outcomes. If you do that, with the assumptions of 3-4 win potential from Gamel and Gomez, we are pretty darn close to being a team that should be in the race.