I'm going to bow out of the discussion for now because I think the two school of thought on this are far enough apart where we're not going to change each other's minds. I'd like to see Parra kept to 170 or fewer innings. The 30 innings he gives up to someone else, preferably now and not later in the season, are a very small percentage of innings pitched by the club this year. There are an infinite number of "what if" scenarios involving the innings he wouldn't pitch, but statistically, there would be very little difference in the impact of those 30 innings on the club if Parra pitched them, or if Suppan/McClung/Bush/Villanueva pitched them. The average marginal output between Parra and any of those guys over the course of 30 innings just isn't that great. During that span, Suppan could have a 2.50 ERA and Parra could have a 7.00 ERA. Who knows, really? I do know that there seems to be some merit to the practice of gradually ramping up the pressure put on the arm, and many teams have arrived at the number of 25-30 innings increase per year. I also know we need Manny Parra going forward, whether or not we are in the playoff contention between '09 and '12 or not. If he is pitching for us over that time span, our odds are better than if we lose him to injury. There are infinite possibilities of infinite things happening over the course of the rest of the season. The Brewers know what is at stake, and they need to balance that with the future of the franchise. 30 innings is not that much to the 2008 Brewers, but it could be a lot for Manny Parra and the Brewers' future postseason prospects.