Yeah, the argument shouldn’t be “Did the Brewers get better at the deadline?” They did not. If you want to argue that they did not get worse, ok. If you love the prospects, it’s great for 2024-2028.
The question should be “Did Stearns and Attanasio have talks about payroll in 2023/2024?” THAT should be a given, but I don’t know if it was given comments from both recently. If I’m Stearns, I would want to know if we could add significant payroll, albeit from arby increases in 2023 and 2024, to temporarily go above what is budgeted. If Stearns thinks, I cannot keep EVERYONE (Burnes, Woodruff, Hader, Adames, etc..) next year, I better make life easier for myself this season and make a prospects trade at an opportune time, rather than having more issues in $ and trading this offseason, then the optics are tricky. I really hope they are communicating, even now, about the futures of Burnes and Woodruff, especially.
Then the question is…Did we trade Hader to get better long term or was it more about trading to better afford 2023/2024 payrolls?