There is a lot of good will for DM around the Brewer fan base because we made it into the playoffs. I'll remember our birth for a long long time, it's special to me, but when trying to evaluate players/managers/coaches we need to try to separate our good/bad will from discussion and try to keep it as objective as possible. DM has done some great moves, but I personally think his magic is done. I've grown tired of watching the waiver wire for anyone who remotely had a connection with Texas, soon as you see a Waiver you know they'll be a Brewer. That and now it appears to be a former aging Cardinal. I'm not sure how to create a metric for GMs, but to me, DM is stuck in the idea that we are a larger market then we are. The Suppan FA acquisition was grossly over paid for, yes the market was very high, but that doesn't mean we have to participate in it. The question is, who has the higher % of win share for the management? Was it Jack Z and his draft/scouting, or is it DM for trades/FA Acquisition? To me, it seems since most of our stars are home grown, it's hard for me to give the props to DM for it.