It could also be GM-speak for "bring a legit offer or don't even bother" I find it insanely hard to believe that, if the Brewers wind up selling, that they'd have some moronic & arbitrary rule about not dealing their most valuable realistically-tradeable chip. But I do have to say, my first reaction on reading that quip was basically summed up in your post. I've just taken some more time to try & digest that snippet... and perhaps am talking nonsense to calm down my panic I agree, I think it has to be GM posturing. I can't fathom that we would be sellers and NOT sell Greinke. There is no logic behind that. I also don't buy the argument that trading Greinke is going to prevent us from signing him in the offseason. I don't see that making a difference. People often try to make free agency more political than it really is. Most of the time, it's not. If he becomes a free agent, and I think at this point it's almost certain that he will, he will probably take the best and biggest offer his agent gets, just like 95% of other free agents. If that team is us, he'll be back, regardless of whether or not we trade him mid-season or not. If not, he'll be going elsewhere anyway. He's not going to leave millions of dollars on the table to play for a quieter city because of an overblown anxiety issue.