I would just like to point out, that I do not recall one game this season where the "save your closer" rule that we've employed on the road, has worked out in our favor. Not one. I think it may have happened once in the first week of the season. And again, I think you can explain the flawed logic with simple mathematics: A. Margin of error tied on the road in extra's: 0 (you give up a run, like Wise did, and it's game over). B. Margin of error leading in extra's: >= 1 (could be 1 run, could be 5) So, please, tell me, why is situation A a situation for any closer, whereas situation B is a guy where you NEED your best reliever? Let's say CoCo comes in in the 10th. He shuts the door. The Brewers score 1 in the top of the 11th, and then Wise comes in during the bottom of the 11th and gives up a run to tie it back up at 3. Now, "conventional wisdom" says I'm going to be furious at Ned for blowing Cordero in the 10th, and not "saving" him for the 11th when we had the lead. But I'm not. Why? Because, it is very simple, if Wise gave up a run in the 11th, you can assume he would have given up a run in the 10th, and had he done so, the game would be OVER. At least now, it is still tied, and we still have a CHANCE to win, but had we SAVED Cordero for the 11th, there would never have been an 11th, because Wise would have given up the run in the 10th. Again, tell me how the above paragraph does not make sense, because it makes perfect sense to me. The only possible logic for not using your closer early in extras is to save his arm for another day. And at this point in the season, savings arms be damned.