Some of these arguments are missing the point. No one is arguing that the ump was good against Archer, and no one is arguing that a borderline strike isn't still a strike. The point was, in the real world, sometimes the umpires get the borderline calls right, and sometimes they get them wrong. Yes, in a perfect world he would have called them strikes. No, that doesn't always happen. When you are facing a pitcher not hitting half his weight, your success or failure should not be predicated on having the borderline calls go correctly your way. It's a pitcher. Just attack him. If he walked Josh Bell under the same circumstances I'd be a little more sympathetic.