First, we have no clue how much Braun http://actuallypaid this guy. All people have to go from is that the guy wrote on a piece of paper $20-30K. Not exactly hard evidence. If all it takes in court to collect payments is me writing something on a piece of paper paper then Bill Gates will soon be owing me alot of money. Braun and his lawyers make it seem like Bosch's contribution was negligible, so Braun's statement that there was a dispute as per money owed sounds plausible. Second, you keep saying there is no reason for Braun's attorneys to spend any time or money consulting with a shady character, are you an attorney? Are you familiar with what is or is not standard practice for a defense case of this kind? Wendy Thurm, who was an attorney for 20 years and is now a baseball writer weighed in on this exact issue. She tweeted: "Why would Braun use Bosch? To assist with defense behind scenes & perform tasks the testifying experts can't do. Standard lawyer practice." Additionally she said, "How many PED "experts" were willing to help Braun in case against MLB? No one connected to official testing orgs would go near Braun's case." So yes, there is in fact a plausible explanation for Braun using a dirtbag as a consultant for his defense. Once again, it is literally amazing how quick people are to jump to a verdict with the only evidence being three pieces of handwritten paper which contain vague references to Braun. While it is unsettling to know that a PED dealer even mentions Braun's name, it would be nice to actually wait for some context before deciding who is or is not guilty. We would expect nothing less for ourselves.