I get that there is an hypothesis going around that you have to hit a large number of home runs to win in the postseason, with the argument being that you face mostly high leverage pitching so you can't string baserunners together and are better off just trying to hit mistakes out of the ballpark.
I don't know that I buy it. By that logic we should have lost to the Cubs last year since they were 6th in regular season home runs and we were 22nd.
The list of why we lost to the Dodgers has about 10 other things of equal importance on it.
Out of the other LCS teams...2025 Toronto was maybe a beacon to aim for because they had a balanced offense with league-average home run hitting (191 HR vs. 188 league average). However, they have failed to replicate that success in 2026 and are now near the bottom of the league in most offensive categories.
Seattle is another perhaps. They are generally a poor offensive team but are optimized for their home ballpark which favors home runs over singles and doubles. Again, they have failed to replicate their 2025 success and are near the bottom of the league in scoring (despite being #10 in HR). Seattle's first game against Skubal was perhaps an example of home run hitting winning a game, with Jorge Polanco getting 2 solo HR in a 3-2 win (ALDS game 2). However, in their second game against Skubal (ALDS game 5) they scored off him with a more Brewers-like double-stolen base-sac fly combo. In both cases it was ultimately their ability to work long ABs and drive up Skubal's pitch count that won them those games, with the winning hits in both coming off of bullpen arms.