Hopefully yes. It's a very smart strategy. While any team can claim him and put him on their 40 man, we are now the only ones who have a chance to keep him without using a 40 man roster spot. I am all for doing that with as many players as possible. All it can do is allow us to accumulate players for essentially no cost in players or 40 man roster spots. It's the little things like that which add up to stronger farm systems. it's a risky strategy. it didn't work out last year in trying to outright blake parker, steve geltz and adam walker (all three were claimed by other teams), but perhaps the brewers are looking to outright baker before clubs non-tender arbitration eligible players (which would open up space on their own 40-man rosters to add baker). or, the brewers may see enough in baker to want to keep him on the 40-man roster, knowing he can be optioned in 2018. time will tell. as mentioned in the catcher battle thread, i can't see how the brewers are going to continue to carry five catchers on their 40-man roster--especially when three of the five are out of minor league options, coupled with the club's practice in carrying just two catchers on the 25-man roster.