a player can be given an outright assignment more than once. it's just after the first outright assignment, that the player has the right to refuse the minor league assignment and become a free agent. nottingham has never been outrighted before, so it remains a possibility (if he were to clear outright waivers). Cant [sic] a team claim him but then still stuff him in their AAA even though he doesn't have an option? It was something I think happened not long ago that I feel shouldn't happen. The claiming team imo should be forced to place him on 26man or return back to Brewers in this instance. when you claim a player off waivers, you have to add him to your 40-man roster. if he's out of options, he has to be added to your active roster. remember rob scahill? in 2017, he accepted an outright assignment by the brewers three times--which also means he cleared outright waivers three times that year. the first time he was outrighted, he had no choice but to accept the minor league assignment. the other two times, he could've refused the assignment and declared free agency, but he didn't. scahill's contract was selected by the brewers after the first outright assignment, and then again after the second outright assignment. but after the third outright assignment in 2017, he spent the rest of the season with class aaa colorado springs.