After thinking about this I might be coming around 1. a CC trade would have to involve LaPorta or Gamel 2. We obviously wouldn't resign CC so we would be getting 2 high draft picks 3. So if we trade just for example LaPorta, Salome, and Seidel we would essentially be trading 3 prospects for 2 picks + Sabathia. It just seems that the net effect of the trade could be a positive one, even if it is a 2 month rental, so long as we are left with at least one of Gamel / LaPorta. I would rather keep Gamel because of his superstar offensive numbers. And since all of our young guys are still under our control for 2 more years we have two years before we "need" the next group of young guys. And of course any trade of Fielder would allow us to restock our farm system anyways. With our 6 top picks this year it is safe to say that at least one of them will develop into a LaPorta/Gamel type prospect. Even with the trade of the proposed players we still have these players available to us in 2 years (assuming no Fielder trade) 1st Base - Fielder, Errecart, Nelson, Gamel 2nd Base - Weeks, Bell SS - Hardy, Escobar, Dykstra, Brewer 3rd - Gamel, Green, Hall? OF - Gamel, Braun, Hart, Brantley, Gillespie, Cain, Dykstra C- LuCroy, Lawrie, Rottino Pitchers - Gallardo, Parra, Jeffress, Odorizzi, Fredrickson, Lintz, Braddock, Periard, Anundsen, Hammond, Wright, maybe Sheets or other FA/Trade pick up This list doesn't even include the two picks from Sabathia and all other draft picks in the next 2 years. Its safe to say that we would certainly have enough prospects to keep the train rolling in Milwaukee, even if some of them don't turn out. I think we are pretty weak at 2nd if Weeks doesn't pan out soon but besides that we have plenty of options and all positions and pitchers. Plus Cleveland is in the AL so I am not going to worry of LaPorta does turn out to be very good.