He used a perfectly acceptable and accurate tense. He used present tense, which is allowed for things that have occurred in the past and continue to the present. There's nothing misleading about it.You can argue that what TH is saying , tensewise, is accurate, but it is vague. If you put something in the simple present, it comes across as a habitual action. Furthermore if you're using past actions as the semantic basis for your present tense construction, you are pretty much saying that the past actions are indicators for actions to come. If you say, "I go to Brewers games", it means you regularly go to games, and that is is reasonable to expect that you will go at some point in the future. As a sports journalist, Tom H should stick to facts. Swindle has given up runs every time he's been up. That's what might discourage management from calling him up. Not that he is always expected to give up runs by management. If Tom H knows that is the reason as a fact, then that is what he should report. I hope that DiFelice is hurt that they don't rush him back. I don't know what the future holds in terms of getting starting pitching, and if we'll procure a pitcher who can lessen the workload for the bullpen. The last thing I want is a BP meltown from nagging injuries come September. I do wonder if Swindle will get another chance in the big league club. He's doing so well at AAA, that I have to believe he has some value at the big league level. I hope so anyway.