Your presumption of my tone and my frame of mind are just that - presumptions - and on both counts you're incorrect. However, especially given your accusation, I find it interesting that the words you've chosen can easily be taken in the exact same way. I don't have time to dig through close to two months' worth of JSOnline articles, blogs, & chats to find the quotes, but I can safely say I read statements by TH in at least two places that made it pretty clear that the two PTBNL going to the Mets would not be "players of consequence" (my paraphrase). For as thoroughly well-read & aware that so many posters are on this site, I found it odd (a combination of both "humorous" and "frustrating") to keep seeing posts about folks' fears that Green, McClendon, etc. were the types of players going to the Mets when it seemed pretty clear that the Mets were going to get minor league "roster fillers" -- which Rosario & Herrera pretty much are, and which Green, McClendon, etc. are not. From my understanding, all Haudricourt ever said was they wouldn't be top prospects. Which is why most here didn't believe Green would be included. However, McClendon was a pretty good guess since the Mets GM said it was someone who has contributed and had some success at the major league level. I wouldn't lump Green and McClendon into the same group. Sure McClendon could be useful but he is basically just another arm. It's not that far-fetched to think he might've been included.