Jump to content
The trade deadline is one day away, and 76 of our top 80 are still on the board. Click here to stay up-to-date! ×
Brewer Fanatic

patrickgpe

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    7,838

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

News

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Top Prospects Ranking

Milwaukee Brewers Videos

2022 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

Milwaukee Brewers Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

2024 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Picks

The Milwaukee Brewers Players Project

2025 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Milwaukee Brewers Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by patrickgpe

  1. patrickgpe
    Bucks trade Patty C and 2 2nds for V. Micic.. This has been absolutely insane. Also they signed Gary Harris. Sims also resigned.
  2. patrickgpe
    that's the true definition of all in.
  3. patrickgpe
    well this must be the plan they laid out to Giannis to keep him around. Bucks are now instant contenders again with Turner. Need a PG still. Have no idea how much cap space they have below the 2nd apron or MLE $ they have. anyone have any idea?
  4. patrickgpe
    As someone who has said for years they need to address corner IF early in the draft, I'm good with this. I know they have some guys progressing through but this gives more darts to throw at the dartboard.
  5. patrickgpe
    The brewers have a type, so I will predict Cunningham. The player that intrigues me is Neyens. A power corner IF bat.
  6. patrickgpe
    from NBAdraft.net. Don't know much about the guy but he was the top available player on ESPN at 47. There are also reports that the bucks signed Mark Sears to a 2 way contract. Not sure how he translates as a pro, but he is an interesting prospect. https://www.jsonline.com/story/sports/nba/bucks/2025/06/26/milwaukee-bucks-set-to-sign-alabama-guard-mark-sears-to-two-way-contract/84361098007/
  7. patrickgpe
    It seems like a weak draft. what I don't want is for the bucks to trade a future 1st to get into the first tonight.
  8. patrickgpe
    Gery Woefel (not sure how dialed in he is anymore) was on WSSP and said he hasn't heard the bucks to be active in any trade talks.
  9. patrickgpe
    @LouisEly @nate82 I was mistaken. #22 and #0 are not getting retired, but rather their jerseys are. Marquette no longer retires numbers for anyone.
  10. patrickgpe
    for college it is silly. Its a little easier to do now that 6-9 can be used, but when all numbers were between 0-5, its easy to run out. I get retiring the jersey of pro's that made the HOF. What the bucks did under Kohl was silly with regards to retiring numbers. Both players had great Marquette careers, despite not doing much after. They should be recognized. I tend to agree with you that jersey retirement may be a little much.
  11. patrickgpe
    McNeal and Howard are getting their numbers retired next season. Well deserved, not great pros but they made their mark on Marquette's program. Crean will be recognized as well. I do wonder how far jersey retirements will go. Kolek would deserve it then as well.
  12. patrickgpe
    I hope this is true
  13. patrickgpe
    Konan-Niederhauser seems like a big that could fall as seniors typically do in drafts these days, in addition to the players above that I’d like. The do need a big as well.
  14. patrickgpe
    I agree it doesn’t matter, but did you see what they allegedly asked from the spurs. Players and 10 firsts.
  15. patrickgpe
    The cost would be much more. One first and a few 2nds is not enough draft capital. Brooks and Green are nice players but Giannis in his prime is worth way more than that. the grizzlies got more for bane than this.
  16. patrickgpe
    @Jopal78I think of it more than utilizing extra resources for a need. Quintana won't be back in 2026. If the can get a hitter for him, I don't see that as bad when there are options to replace him.
  17. patrickgpe
    If there is no room for Logan, than there isn't for Tobias. Plus Murphy is clearly not a fan of his work.
  18. patrickgpe
    Draft is in 8 days, bucks pick 47th. I don't see how they can take a project again. Last year they could have taken Dunn in the 1st and Kolek in the 2nd. Both would have helped last season and could have been key contributors of the bench this year. Looking at mocks, I do like Kam as a 3pt shooter off of the bench this year. More possibilities are Nembhard and Brea. I do like RJ Luis, but his jump shot isn't where the other 3 are.
  19. patrickgpe
    Exactly that was my point of this thread. I started this before the civale trade. If they traded Patrick the return has to be more than a rental. I think trading Quintana makes sense and then Henderson can have his spot.
  20. patrickgpe
    My point is exactly that, trade the bottom guys in the rotation for rentals. They have young guys close and they have young starters in triple a that are ready. The civale trade didn’t accomplish my goal, not that I was expecting it to. Do you think the team wouldn’t be better off if they traded Quintana to make way for Henderson? Patrick is a different case because of how much control he has, you can’t trade a rental for him. demoting civale did decrease his value because it was in the brewers best interest to move him asap, I bet you that if civale pitches better or as well as he pitched here, the Sox will flip for better value than Vaughn
  21. patrickgpe
    When i created this thread, my hope was to discuss players that would be rentals for our pitching depth. The Brewers have Pratt, Boeve, and Wilken to help at short and 3rd in the near future, but aren't there yet. I think they can get someone who can help in the short term. Obviously if the brewers have a bad week against the cubs and cards and fall way behind, then there is no point to this exercise.
  22. patrickgpe
    I do believe Peralta will be traded either at the deadline if they are out of it or in the offseason. That being said, he is worth a decent return of young prospect or 2 with some potential. Civale on the other hand will probably get you a single A pitcher or 2 with some potential.
  23. patrickgpe
    Civale has requested a trade, but not sure you are getting much back.
  24. patrickgpe
    i knew we could get there :)
  25. patrickgpe
    i understand your point and I agree with you that dealing a Chad Patrick should get you better than a Jerry Hairston. The point of this thread is that nobody would argue that they don't have an excess of starting pitching nor would anyone argue that their daily lineup could use some help. I do not think its wise to trade anyone of top 30 prospect status for that player. I was just wondering if the brewers could move the bottom of their rotation for a player. The Brewers are not a championship caliber team, but I think they could still be a playoff team but need to improve their lineup to do so.
×
×
  • Create New...