I have a Popular Science magazine that did a special on sports, in particular winning the Gold Glove. The article talks about the 2007 GG award, also going to David Wright. A few things stuck out to me before I got to the "meat" of the article. In 2007, DW made 21 errors, and had a .954 fielding percentage. He was in the bottom 5 of the NL 3rd basemen. This is directly from the article in my magazine: "...Fielding Percentage is great for identifying how often a player handles and throws batted balls without error, but it fails to assess that player's ability to reach balls in the first place. With this in mind, Chris Dial, a pharmaceutical research chemist in North Carolina, came up with the "defensive runs saved" system, which accounts for not just balls a player handles but the balls a player SHOULD handle, expressing a fielder's defensive skill in terms of the number of runs he saves or costs his team. Using the defensive-runs-saved-formula, Dials found that Gold Glove voters should not, in fact, have given the award to Wright... ...the best defensive third basemen in the National League, as it turns out, was the SF Giant's Pedro Feliz." Sorry for the long quote, but I thought of this article when I opened the thread and thought I would share. DW's 2008 defensive numbers aren't really lighting up the charts either, and I agree with some above posters that this award means little to me anymore as well. Not sure how much credibility I would put into Chris Dial's formula, but he seemed to find a formula that agrees with a lot of people's notions of David Wright's defense in the first place: not exactly Gold Glove. *Edit - I originally put Popular Mechanics, not Mechanics but Science. My bad.