Melvin traded his one shot to acquire a pitcher of significant talent without having to give up a MLB piece for a rental player, the emotional response to a playoff appearance aside, was that one appearance worth losing the nest 2 years and maybe 3? This, imo, is a very difficult question. In a cold, hard assessment of franchise building, I agree completely with your view that it was a mistake. However, there's a bit of gray involved, in that the playoff appearance itself was -- and continues to be -- a big step/achievement for the franchise. Now, of course, that isn't to say that the 2008 team wouldn't have made the playoffs if a (younger) pitcher who would have been here longer had been acquired instead of Sabathia. However, I think the chances of anyone -- let alone a younger pitcher -- pitching as dominantly as Sabathia did in his time here are slim to none. While I agree with your method in general, I don't believe it's as simple as being 100% for or against of Melvin's decision to go after CC. While it certainly hasn't continued to help the team on the field, it has helped at the gates & in terms of merchandising and other revenues. I think Melvin saw a shot to go after a WS title in 2008, and like you say, you don't get there without elite pitching. Up until Sheets was injured (after throwing a brilliant season for the Crew), the Brewers had as good a top 3 starting pitchers as there was in baseball, maybe the best. In hindsight, I definitely would have preferred to see Melvin view things as a continual process of building, but I honestly can't say I blame him absolutely for seeing a shot to go for it, and taking it. While on the surface, it may just be the emotional reaction you mention, that emotional reaction has led to very tangible revenue increases. I won't argue that Melvin has spent money wisely, but the playoff appearance has absolutely given the team more money to work with. I just think it's a complex issue.