It just feels like some people on this forum almost resent Casey McGehee (and consequently Ken Macha) for taking Gamel's job. I think that is kind of pathetic. What's more "pathetic" is betting that a guy who had success out of nowhere in a prime-aged season will continue that success. Gamel has a track record of top performance in the minors, and even showed flashes of that brilliance even though he never got a fair shot at playing time thanks to the good ol' boy Macha. Honestly when you analyze things objectively, McGehee just doesn't hold an edge over Gamel. Mat's younger, far more athletic, faster, has a higher ceiling & a better glove. Sure McGehee had a good year at the plate, but he was bad in the field (with no tools to suggest he'll ever be better than average -- even when healthy, unlike Gamel). If this guy doesn't scream Bill Hall v2.0 I don't know who does. Do you really need to see him turn in a .750-ish OPS on an annual basis to believe that's what he's likely to do? The trouble is if Gamel is traded away, you have to watch him turn in mid-800 OPS seasons & better for the rest of his career. It's not only that Gamel is more likely to outproduce Casey next season -- it's that he's more likely to outproduce (offense & defense) Casey for the entirety of their careers.