Ultimately though, it's on Melvin's doorstep to make sure the Major League roster is balanced. DJ, you keep repeating the same generalized comment, that 'Melvin should have done more.' Instead of just throwing that generalization out there, let's hear some ideas you propose. As far as I can tell, there was one trade made last offseason that would satisfy your desires -- Edwin Jackson to DET. Now, beyond the one trade that one GM out of 30 was able to swing, what else are you after here? Melvin listed off great examples of the volatility of the FA market in the McCalvy article, and I would venture to guess that you'd be one of the first in line slamming Melvin had he signed Lowe (who didn't want to play here) & crippled our payroll by not identifying good SPing. What he did was play the lowest risk (short contract) on the FA market, and thankfully he was right to do so. Long, expensive FA contracts are never/rarely a good idea. And before you talk about how he's had X number of years, really, I'd like to hear you provide some tangible examples and/or comparisons. Trades that actually happened. It's not that I doubt you can find any, it's that the blanket statements of how bad Melvin has been -- like "People gripe that we can't be sure of the opportunities he's had to obtain pitching, but you can't honestly believe there weren't potential moves out there during the past 3-4 years involving one or more of these guys" -- without any tangible comparisons are getting tired. I really hope your response isn't along the lines of, 'It's not my job, that's Melvin's job.' And for the record I agree with you that the use of LaPorta was ill-advised, but I think Melvin saw a shot to go after the WS (not just the postseason) & took it.