I took teatoe's words in the OF thread literally, since I agreed with his sentiments: "Someone should start an infield thread if there isn't one already. Ideas would really fly there." So let's get talking. I'll start with the SS question... I understand Escobar's awesome defense, and this comment has nothing to do with Alcides... at this point, J.J. imho is the player that should have to get displaced, not Escobar. I understand the contractural implications and all, but if Alcides's bat really is MLB-ready for 2009, then 2B is the spot where he should be playing. I know that overall, SS is the more valuable defensive spot. But moving Hardy to 2B really makes the range of the right side of the IF a big concern when paired with Fielder. A SS Hardy & 2B Escobar combo would be such an upgrade over what we have now defensively that it really wouldn't even be funny. I think in general people know how I feel about Rickie Weeks. But if the decision starts to become 'Hardy or Escobar at SS?', then I think I'd rather have it posed as 'Keep Rickie or JJ?' Hardy's approach at the plate in general is second imo only to Fielder. J.J. has really surprised a lot of people, I think, this season. Most/many around BF.net felt his power would taper off a bit heading into 2008, but JJ is right there, both in terms of counting stats & SLG. His more polished & improved plate discipline (& OBP, of course) only makes me that much more confident looking beyond 2008. In summation, I think SS J.J. + 2B Escobar > SS Esco + 2B J.J./Rickie. Now, if Hardy would accept a move to 3B, then imo that'd be the perfect storm. However, since I think it's a bit unreasonable to hope for what would essentially be our best-case scenario, I look at it as though Hardy would not move to third. The 3B question is a whole separate can of worms. I just hope, in any event, that Russell can come back healthy for us (the sooner the better, obviously). Bill Hall has not been the answer this season, nor will he be the answer next season. He can't hit RHP. He just isn't a good option. If the answer for 3B could be a strict Branyan/Hall platoon, that'd be great imo (Hall '08 v. LHP: .383/.549/.932 OPS; Branyan '08 v. RHP: .375/.658/1.033). Unfortunately, we have a manager that seems to value the 'I know you better' factor, and keeps Branyan from contributing because... ? We have a pretty darn good 3B candidate for '09 (Branyan/Hall), but will the manager capitalize on it?