I just don't understand how a team that has been struggling to score runs over the past week can afford to sit their hottest hitter. Hall isn't in the lineup again.......and again we trot Ginter and Clark out there. I can understand the desire to get Billy some time, but why isolate Ginter and Clark? Keith's OPS is .810 and while he hasn't been tearing the cover off the ball, he hasn't been terrible either. Clark is 3-for-9 with a walk in his last thirteen plate appearances (that's the last 7 days) and the reason he's in there is because Yost likes his career stats against Wells (5-for-http://forum.brewerfan.net/images/smilies/glasses.gif . That's a ridiculously small sample, but that's what Yost said about the decision. Apparently he had originally intended for Clark to start all three games - one in left, one in center, and one in right - but I guess the rainout changed that. I just don't get it. I'm not sure how comfortable Billy is playing third, so it seems like he's only going to get playing time at shortstop and second. With Counsell Nedley's new favorite player (with Wes on the DL), I don't think he's going to see a lot of time there. And with Spivey just back from injury, I would guess Nedley will let him play everyday for a while. I wouldn't mind giving Billy an occasional start in place of Ginter or in right-field, but I just don't see that happening. And to what benefit was it to bring up Corey Hart if he isn't going to get anytime. 5 to 7 days of rotting on the bench isn't doing anything for his advancement. I am pretty sure we could have brought up McGruder or Liefer to do that. Come on Yost. That was a 40-man roster decision. Hart is on the 40-man whereas Nunnally, Magruder, and Leifer are not. Therefore, we would have had to DFA one of the 25-man players in order to bring them up. I don't think he'll be up for very long, and so there's really no long-term detriment to his development. If anything, I'm sure it's extra motivation because I'm sure he's having the time of his life. ~Bill