plus TH might very well have not written the headline for the piece. hard to argue that the headline as it is, is a lot more catchy than "Gamel just happy to be playing." and in the media, the dividing line between catchy and misleading is a thin one. it was from an earlier post, but i don't think the JS has an obligation to be objective at all. maybe in a game summary, sure, but certainly not in a column. those would be boring columns to read. i think there's also a lot of reader bias that comes through. generally, everyone on bf.net really likes Gamel, so when TH says something negative, that gets a "TH stinks!" reaction. but if Haudricourt was ripping on Gomez, that probably wouldn't get a reaction. in the end, we're all sure animated about what TH writes, and his articles are drawing a lot of reaction, whether that's positive or negative. and isn't that the whole point of his job?