Not sure if anyone else has read Michael Hunt's latest opinion article : Need for upgrade: Deal could cure Brewers' woes Now I have read a lot of head scratchers in the JS before, but this is the first time I actually felt the need to send in a comment. Coupled with Tom creating a "fight between Melvin and Braun" I have really had it with their sports section. I have included my email to Hunt and his editor below, as I thought others might want to see it. We will see if I get any kind of response. Mr. Hunt, I typically look forward to reading your opinion articles on the Brewers as I think you add a lot over the beat writers, but I was very disappointed by the irresponsible reporting in this article. I have shaken my head many times over stories I have read in your paper before, but this is the first time I have felt the need to actually send an email. I will keep it as brief as I can, but first of all you claim that the Brewers offense is ranked 12th in the National League. I am guessing you are using batting average to come to this conclusion, because by nearly every other statistical measure, the team is ranked in the top 5. Most people would agree that OPS would be the best method, and in that regard the team is currently ranked 3rd. The reason I have an issue here is that I have been hearing casual fans call into radio stations lately bashing Braun and the offense. While the team has its issues on offense (Kendall, Hart, and Hardy come to mind) every team does. To suggest this is a problem and back it up with a somewhat random statistic, all the while not mentioning what statistic you are actually using, is wrong in my mind. Then, as if the casual fans need more ammunition, you stated "the Brewers are paying Braun face-of-the-franchise money to be a leader." Huh? His contract is extremely reasonable as he signed for security early in his career instead of going the Boras/Prince route to get as much as possible after arbitration. He is the face of the franchise by his choosing and he should be admired for his commitment, not condemned. Next, you wrote "As the Sabathia blockbuster demonstrated, the future is always now for a franchise like the Brewers." We obviously have a differing opinion on whether or not Gamel or Escobar should be traded for help this year, so I am not going to argue with you on that in this email. I do think it’s silly to suggest that a small market team like the Brewers should operate with the idea that “the future is always now.” This could not be further from the truth, and the Brewers have expressed this view many times when saying they would like to be similar to the Twins and Athletics. To play the "Sabathia card" here is a low blow as well, since that situation was completely different. At the time the Brewers had Sheets (and had to assume he would finish out the year healthy) and assumed they could get the best 1-2 pitching combination in the majors. This year, Yo will most likely hit a wall somewhere on the plus side of 150 IP just as Parra did last year. Even if he somehow defies all known historical data on young pitchers increasing their innings, to suggest that a Yo and Vazquez tandem is even in the same realm as Sheets and Sabathis is ridiculous (and I have long coveted Vazquez for his modest salary and great peripherals). In closing, we clearly disagree on the Brewer's chances this year trade or no trade. I am fine with this, as I think most people want the team to go for it and opinions will always differ. I do have a problem with the manner in which you defend your position, as you will take many fans with you through questionable logic. With the amount of readership you have, I feel as though you and your editors have a responsibility to report fairly in terms of the players you cover and the statistics of the game even if it is an opinion article. I hope you have taken the time to read this, and it doesn't come off as "flaming" similar to what Tom experiences from time to time in his blog. As I said, I am a fan of your writing, but in this case I have to take exception. Thanks for your time,