Well, Peralta is not Lucroy. Gallo would actually be a pretty fair trade for Peralta. Not that I want that to happen, or think it will. But his name at least makes sense in the context of a Peralta trade, where it never made any sense in a Lucroy trade. All of this Peralta talk with the Rangers is a smoke screen anyhow, Braun is the one who will be traded. Gallo and.... Yeah... that makes some sense. My point though is that Stearns didn't seem to express much interest in Gallo (from what was being reported) at the time. Maybe that changes for someone like a Peralta but I still don't think he really fits the mold of a Stearns type acquisition.