Again, in the minor lg. using the automated zone this past year, there was not that many problems. Umpires said the strike notification was instant and there was virtually no difference in the timing of their ball-strike calls. Height of the zone wasn't a significant problem. People act as if there already wasn't a huge discrepancy in the height of the strike zone. Watch the game and see how much the zone varies by umpire. Using the automated zone makes correcting height and width fairly simple. The ultimate goal is consistancy, something that was unobtainable using umpires. I think everyone is well aware. It is the fact their "fix" still doesn't solve the problem. I vote they just take pitch tracking off the TV so everyone can stop being an expert on balls/strikes that are typically off by no more than an inch or two the majority of the time. I guess I just don't see this making the game better and reducing the constant complaining. That seems to be sports in a nutshell these days, just complain about everything related to officiating. They gave us replay...still a crowd of people complaining even after they review it. If that can't make the masses happy, an automated strike zone probably won't either. If it does happen pitchers with insane breaking stuff are going to be thrilled though. They use data to set the strike zone. Once they have all the data for all of the players the zone will be common for that player. Part of the issue - especially for some of these guys is that they don't have enough data available to set a strike zone. Plus, some of these guys aren't used to hitting 'strikes' that clip the top or bottom of the zone. I do agree with your guess about breaking pitches. Guys that are deep in the box will definitely be susceptible to breaking pitches(as they are already).