I posted early on in this thread that I find TH to be a much better writer than AW. I don't think there's even any debate over that. However, I've noticed something else that bugs me. Beat writers should indeed be objective, and I think TH is fairly objective, but AW really seems to enjoy bashing the Brewers. Even in a fairly well-played Brewers win, AW will find some negatives in it, and those negatives will be the focus of his blog. He'll rail on (insert starting pitcher here) for only going 5 innings and giving up 4 runs (3 earned), and the terrible defense due to a tough error that could have gone either way and a couple of "seeing eye singles." Finally, almost as an afterthought, he'll come up with a gem like: "Despite (insert starting pitcher here)'s poor performance and the terrible defense the Brewers still won, 14 to 5." Wait. Huh?