I knew you were referring to Stearns, and I was not one of the people who complained about it. Thank you, though, for the apology and thank you to those who stood up for me. There was a post - I thought it was from you, but maybe I'm not remembering correctly - when I questioned not having Thames in the lineup vs. Bailey (a RHP on the Reds), and was told to look up Braun's career numbers and "go back and edit (your) post". This is a good example - and I'm not bring it up to call anyone out, but to use it as an example and a teaching moment - of what the mods are referring to, as that last part was not necessary. Maybe it was in jest, but it's hard to tell that in writing as words on a screen don't have voice inflection, facial expressions, etc. A better way to phrase that response could have been something like, "They all have crushed the Reds and Bailey - he's having a tough season, but Braun's likely in the lineup because he has a 1.100 career OPS vs. Bailey." Could have made the same point without the last comment. Again, not calling anyone out here, just showing an example of how the same point could be made without potentially offending anyone. The point the mods are making is, take an extra second or two to think about your comments before hitting submit. No need to call anyone names, no need to call someone out because they didn't find some obscure stat, no need to make it personal. Just "stick to the facts", state your opinion/stats and nothing more, and move on. And when in doubt, use blue font or add a smiley face/emoji to reinforce that you are joking.