We went to the game yesterday, too, so I apologize if much of this was covered in this thread. It is clear that the offense is the main problem. Before Hiura's home run, I think the Brewers had 4 hits... maybe 5. Yelich had a bad game, but he has been hitting well lately. Everybody can have a bad game. However, the rest of the team can't take the day off.
Fast forward to Hiura's homer -- the next batter, Urias, walks. Now, we have the #8 batter, Caratini, up. Bunt. Period. Yes, the third baseman was up on the grass, but sacrifice the batter and move Urias to third. Taylor hits a fly ball to center which may or may not got the runner to third. Then that clears the bottom of the lineup to get one of your hottest hitters, Yelich, up with two outs. Instead, Caratini hits a taylor-made, can of corn double play ball.
One of the arguments will probably be, "Caratini can't bunt." Why not? They probably don't work on it, right? An exit velocity of 45MPH off the bat sucks, right? Sorry, that is not an excuse.
Another argument may be, "Yeah, but what if Caratini gets a base hit." Yeah... "what if." If the bunt is worked on and if players bunt well, then the odds of moving the runner over would be better than "if Caratini gets a base hit."
Maybe my frustration is that I don't think Counsel even considers bunting. Is it something that should be used every time? No. But the atmosphere at the game was: 1. We weren't hitting water if we fell out of a boat, and, 2. the pressure was on the Reds and the momentum was with the Brewers! Put pressure on the defense.
Yes... the last week or so is a small sample size, but the 3PO philosophy is so frustrating.