Dead links would be a definite concern. I know the W3C has a link checker, and maybe a "report dead link" function could be included. If it the process can be made reasonably easy, I think the Usability Director could be talked into monitoring this thing for cleanup. http://forum.brewerfan.net/images/smilies/wink.gif I think we'd definitely want to exclude links going to JS Online and mlb.com. I think we'd also want to limit this to feature stories. If there are sites that are known for dropping pages, those could be excluded, too. Excluded sites could be noted in submission guidelines, and if members miss the guideline, those submissions could be 'intercepted' by the underlying programming. Another issue would be subscription links; those should have some kind of notation. Maybe an icon with an alt attribute and tool tip? I don't think it would hurt if there were a bit of overlap as far as stories included in the Link Reports, but I also wouldn't want to see this become a clone, either. I think the "feature story" vs. "game story" idea might be enough to cover that. And Jim, I think you should certainly be excused from any of the work involved in something like this. You're already doing tons for this site. http://forum.brewerfan.net/images/smilies/smile.gif