I've only read the graphic novel once, but both (maybe all three) of the scenes that you're mentioning here did have meaning from the source material. It goes into the question of just what would possess a person with no special powers to dress up and fight crime...and what it means to them to have that life taken away. To me, it was less about "getting off" on beating people up, so much as an excitement for the job. The only real-world analog that I can think of is a pro athlete's retirement: to go out and put your body on the line time and again....not just a visceral thrill, but the sense of camaraderie which comes with the challenge. Compared to that, everyday life would feel....limp. Most of the surviving characters in the story never really came to terms with that. (I'd say Hollis Mason, the original Nite Owl, is the exception: he gave up the job on his own terms....but I could leave it to others to disagree.) And it wasn't just the Keene Act; Sally Jupiter's character was forced into retirement by motherhood, and look how that turned out. Point being, Dan Dreiberg didn't feel like himself until a mix of circumstance and desperation put him back into the suit. Laurie needed the connection, but Dan needed to feel important, useful, for the first time in 8 years. Did they let those scenes run long? Sure. But they needed to be there to really tell the story. I also think that Snyder tried to tie the material into the theme of man's animal nature a bit more, which is probably the reason for the complaint. Finally saw the movie a week late. My biggest gripe is one that's already been noted in this thread: the violence made the main characters look like they were superhuman, snapping bones and the like. I also could have gone with fewer shots of the Doctor's 'stethoscope'. I can understand the need for the new ending, and it actually stayed much closer to the original version than I was anticipating. A lot of the side-characterization was trimmed down for the sake of time, no one moreso than Silk Spectre. I also thought that the first half of the movie was far more sympathetic to Veidt's motivations than I had remembered....but I wasn't sure if that was the movie or just my knowing what would be coming next. I think the most difficult role in the source material to connect with was Sally Jupiter....and Carla Gugino played her perfectly. I hope that the final element of her story exists as a deleted scene. While I am certainly biased towards the actress (I think she's jaw-droppingly beautiful), I think the glow that she has as the young Sally, and the regretless nostalgia of the older version....deserves a Best Supporting Actress nomination (which she probably won't get). I loved the placement of the music, from the opening credits right down to the 80s nuclear protest tune. That I didn't even hear the Tears for Fears song (which I have on my iPod, so I know the song) gives me a level of appreciation for the density of the movie as well as the source material. The book is still better, but the movie tells the story much better than it should have been able to.