I'll take Pitcher B over Pitcher A anyday. Having too many 4 IP starts will overwork a bullpen very quickly. The second part of the quote is more in-line with my thinking on quality starts: the number of them isn't as important by itself as it is relative to games started. It's a measure of consistency; it is something that you expect from your top 1-2 guys in the rotation, and hope for out of 3-5. Just look at the QS numbers for our starters last year (per ESPN.com) C.C. -- 17 GS (in Milwaukee), 15 QS -- 88.2% Gallardo -- 4 GS, 3 QS -- 75.0% (...the one non-QS was his first game back, when he only threw 4 innings) Sheets -- 31 GS, 18 QS -- 58.1% Bush -- 29 GS, 16 QS -- 55.2% Suppan -- 31 GS, 14 QS -- 45.2% McClung -- 12 GS, 5 QS -- 41.2% Parra -- 29 GS, 10 QS -- 34.5% Villanueva -- 9 GS, 3 QS -- 33.3% ...add in Looper (15 QS in 33 GS = 45.5%) between Bush and Suppan, and that tracks pretty closely with our evaluation of the pitching staff. As another indication of how good the staff has been this year, only one guy is under the 50% mark for quality starts, and that's Looper (2 in 7 GS -- the Brewers record of 5-2 in his starts is due in part to some above-average run support).