Exclusive? Not sure about that. Larkin saw a 20% jump in his votes from last year. 20%. If he wasn't a HOFer last year, then what changed this year? Just because no one better than him was eligible this year doesn't make it right for the baseball writers to "all of a sudden" see how great Larkin was (and yes, I'm glad he's in, well deserved). The system is wrong, and it frustrates me. There should be a two year window to get in. If you were good enough to make it, then the voters should vote you in accordingly w/in that first two years of eligibility. That's what I call exclusive. They would have to change the voters to do this. Fair or not some votes put a lot of weight into how long it takes for someone to get in. There are guys who won't vote Maddux in just so he doesn't get a unanimous vote, there are people who thought Larkin was a HOF player but not a 'first ballot' HOF guy so voted no the first couple of times. I agree the system is dumb but it is the voters fault more than anything else.