This simply is not true. Talk to a professional athlete about it just once and you know it. The money matters and if one team blows away the others this is true, but when someone gets multiple offers that are pretty close the situation usually dictates where they go. Whether they grew up in the area, dislike one of them, want to just be on a winner, have a house closer to one, likes the players on the team, has a history with the hitting/pitching coach etc. It isn't 100% just the highest bid wins. With a team like the Brewers it is even more important because a lot of players are going to pass just based on the market, being in the midwest, the colder weather etc. Being on the team, getting to know the players etc builds a lot of stock into the players chance to sign with the team. If the odds of signing him next year started at 10% they are up to at least 20% if he enjoys his time with us. Think of it in simple terms of you getting a new job. I'm sure there are areas you do not what to move to for work even without going to them. I would hate having to move to New York and I haven't spent more than 3 days there. If I spent half a year in the city my views could very well change. It is no different for a ball player. Now he isn't passing on a $10M deal to take $6M from us or anything, but if we give a fair market offer the odds have gone up for sure assuming he likes it here. He may hate it here and the odds go down. This concept is the entire reason salary caps don't work. The Browns have to pay 50% more for a player than the Patriots do. It is a poorly ran franchise to begin with but it is at a bigger disadvantage in the NFL than any MLB team is even with the salary cap.