Seems like the term caught fire ever since the Lind trade. I know I've used it, seems to perfectly define a talented rookie ball level player. That's why I use it at least. And no offense taken, I can see how it can be annoying. My BF.net annoyance- TOR starter and #5 starter. Here's how see these defined in BF.net: TOR Starter: We must have a Kershaw or Strasburg in order to compete. #5 Starter: Anyone who is not a TOR starter, and/or doesn't have a 98 MPH fastball. Seemingly, there is never any nuance or in between. I've definitely gotten the feeling from reading a lot here that many posters have no interest in pitching prospects unless they have ace potential.