I remember when the "Buster Posey" rule came into effect it was a real cluster with utterly ridiculous calls of runners being called safe when the ball beat them by 40 feet but the catcher was standing in front of the plate without the ball. It seems to me that this rule has now totally been ignored. I can't even remember the last time I heard it even enforced. The last part is the vague part and unfortunately means there will be zero consistency as to how the rule is enforced and gives the umpire and excuse not to call it. There were two plays on Thursday night that really confused me. The first was Urias getting thrown out at the plate. Watch the video and look at the photo. How was Barnhart not blocking the plate without the ball? I guess he was kind of trying to catch the ball but he did not need to go in the path of the runner to make the catch. Urias has no where to go but take a long looping route to avoid running into him as the catcher's whole body was blocking his path to the plate. https://www.mlb.com/gameday/reds-vs-brewers/2021/07/08/633351#game_state=final,lock_state=final,game_tab=videos,game=633351 In my mind, he should have been ruled safe because Barnhart was blocking the plate. The other was JT Realmuto stealing home on a double steal. The throw coming back from the SS was actually cut off by the pitcher so he was safe anyway but the catcher never once moved from his position blocking the plate. Had the throw gone through and the call been out I would have been really interested to see the aftermath. https://www.mlb.com/gameday/phillies-vs-cubs/2021/07/08/633397#game_state=final,lock_state=final,game_tab=videos,game=633397 Collisions at the plate are pretty much nonexistent now so I guess the rule is working in that sense. It seems like that's mainly because baserunners are choosing to just run around a catcher and get tagged out instead of through him.