no. i have been having an ongoing debate with bill hall and luke, they seem to think he is getting lucky and that he is a one dimensional hitter that cant hit righties, which he is solidly dis-proving. It isn't their opinion that Aguilar is "getting lucky" they are looking at stats, specifically BABIP, which is a metric that can be used to determine if performance swings that are dramatic are likely due to "luck". That metric indicates that Aguilar is likely due for a regression because by BABIP he has been "lucky". No opinion, just correct interpretation of the data. Does that mean he will hit like Arcia moving forward? No, but it is very likely that his production will not continue at the current pace. While Aguilar has shown improvement against RH hitters, most posters here realize that you can't make definitive statements based on a small number of at bats because it's most likely those numbers can be influenced by luck (bad and good). Of course, you are free to take whatever sample size you want, it just reduces your credibility to base conclusions on 80 Plate appearances this year and ignore the 200 PAs from last year. in march there was a deluge of people here saying trade aguilar for anything we can get,,,i kept saying i wish they could find a way to keep him and i am glad they didnt trade him...great move by stearns. I looked back at your posts from March and don't see any "wishes" that they could find a way to keep him. I see where you suggest trading Thames because 1) you want to save the $5M; and 2) you didn't like Thames RISP BA. Those don't sound like reasons you think Aguilar is great, but reasons you don't like Thames (who BTW, has outproduced Aguilar last year and was very good before going down this year). this guy aguilar is transforming into an offensive weapon before our very eyes..the whole team is playing well. villar is very hot Hyperbole aside, Jesus has clearly established that he should be the RH part of the 1B platoon when Thames returns (both have wRC+ of 155 which is great for the Brewers). Because of his continued contributions to the offense and because Braun has been in an extended slump (2017+2018) and his age decline may be so advanced that he isn't as valuable contributor to the offense as Aguilar (especially at the ~$18M difference in salary). I think we are all happy they kept Aguilar and as many pointed out a week or so ago, the offense was suffering from 3 extremely poor performances in the lineup and Santana struggling. And its no coincidence the offense has been much better recently as Pina and Villar have started to hit and Santana has improved. For all you doubters out there, take the word of Keith Hernandez. I think some of the doubters of Aguilar are too focused on his minor league career and expecting that to drive expectations of his ML performance. While on average that is the likely expectation from a player, there are players who have mediocre minor league careers and then have very productive major league careers (Phil Nevin comes to mind). It's rare, but it happens and maybe we found a player who just developed late and he will continue to hit much better in the majors than he showed in the minors. His approach at the plate has always been good (whether Keith Hernandez says so or not) and I see every reason to continue to give him opportunities to prove the averages wrong...