You wouldn't have said that about Nelson a year ago most likely. Nelson's career numbers are very close to what Chacin's numbers are for his career as well. We most likely won't have an "ace" pitcher on our team (and we wouldn't with signing Cobb or Arrieta either) but we can have a bunch of guys pitch pretty well and we can be successful. I expect guys like Anderson, Davies, Chacin to have an ERA below 4 and I think the Brewers do as well. If they can do that, we will have similar output from our starters that we did a year ago. With adding Jimmy back in the mix as well towards June-July and possibly getting more out of Guerra, Woodruff, Miley, etc... it is not all doom and gloom to me. Me too. I really like the pitching staff they've manage to assemble. Getting Anderson from the D-Backs and Davies from the Orioles was genius. I think Chacin is likely to have an ERA below 4 as well. I mean, if he could do it in Colorado, he should be able to do it in Miller Park. He may end up being the shrewdest move Stearns made this offseason. I also really like Woodruff as a potential "lite" version of Nelson. What worries me is that the rotation's success is just based on too many "ifs" right now to feel super comfortable. I'm not advocating to blow the budget out of the water to fortify it, but I truly believe at this point that Cobb can be signed to a deal that wouldn't do that. Yes, our success this year is depending on a lot of variables in that rotation as well as bullpen (maybe to a lesser degree) but that is not very uncommon for most franchises. I also think we make this conclusion too early as there still are FA's out there as well as roster cutdown time may leave us another Stearns move that has us all applauding midseason. (The Davies oblique scares me too but maybe it triggers a move to be made?)